<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for National Security Law Brief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:58:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Traumatic Brain Injuries and Insanity Under the UCMJ Regarding March 11, 2012 Shooting in Afghanistan by Terri Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/03/27/traumatic-brain-injuries-and-insanity-under-the-ucmj-regarding-march-11-2012-shooting-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>Terri Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7316#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>Please let me know the if the TBI is succesful as an affirmative defense. My son was convicted of a violent crime in 2007 and against my judgement, counsel chose to keep any TBI info out of the defense. The case was tried in a rural county in Colorado. 

The case was tried in civilian courts, as my son was not a Service Member. The injury was sustained in a collision with a drunk driver BAC.267(in which my son was found to have no fault). 

His conviction is currently being challenged through a 35(c) motion, (a post Appeal remedy provided for in CO law). The fact that the attorney ignored the TBI evidence when there was substantial evidence in favor of the prosecution.

I give my permission for any professional pursueing information about TBI&#039;s and their evolving imparcts on legal proceedings.  

Thank you,
Terri Kennedy,
(970) 980-1879</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please let me know the if the TBI is succesful as an affirmative defense. My son was convicted of a violent crime in 2007 and against my judgement, counsel chose to keep any TBI info out of the defense. The case was tried in a rural county in Colorado. </p>
<p>The case was tried in civilian courts, as my son was not a Service Member. The injury was sustained in a collision with a drunk driver BAC.267(in which my son was found to have no fault). </p>
<p>His conviction is currently being challenged through a 35(c) motion, (a post Appeal remedy provided for in CO law). The fact that the attorney ignored the TBI evidence when there was substantial evidence in favor of the prosecution.</p>
<p>I give my permission for any professional pursueing information about TBI&#8217;s and their evolving imparcts on legal proceedings.  </p>
<p>Thank you,<br />
Terri Kennedy,<br />
(970) 980-1879</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Discriminatory Profiling Practices Lead to Surge in Muslims Added to No-Fly List by Munir Akhtar</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/04/04/discriminatory-profiling-practices-lead-to-surge-in-muslims-added-to-no-fly-list/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Munir Akhtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7287#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>The US citizen should be appalled to see the violation of constitutional rights of their fellow Americans. Today if it is happening to Muslims, tomorrow it could be Jews or Buddists or people of any other faith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US citizen should be appalled to see the violation of constitutional rights of their fellow Americans. Today if it is happening to Muslims, tomorrow it could be Jews or Buddists or people of any other faith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Homegrown Terrorism&#8221;: Is the U.S. training its attackers? by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/03/27/homegrown-terrorism-is-the-u-s-training-its-attackers/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 03:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7163#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>If outside foreign war zones are the most dangerous places for GIs, and the US Homeland is the second most dangerous place, what is the third most dangerous place?  Inside foreign war zones?  Outside domestic war zones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If outside foreign war zones are the most dangerous places for GIs, and the US Homeland is the second most dangerous place, what is the third most dangerous place?  Inside foreign war zones?  Outside domestic war zones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by Online free psychic services start here</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>Online free psychic services start here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>[...] law comes during a heels of a US supervision carrying debated over either or not to indefinitely catch US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- a Obama administration’s chronicle of John Yoo, arguing that a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law comes during a heels of a US supervision carrying debated over either or not to indefinitely catch US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- a Obama administration’s chronicle of John Yoo, arguing that a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by HR 347 &#8216;Trespass Bill&#8217; Criminalizes Protest &#124; The Story of Liberty</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>HR 347 &#8216;Trespass Bill&#8217; Criminalizes Protest &#124; The Story of Liberty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder, arguing that the President can assassinate US citizens without [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder, arguing that the President can assassinate US citizens without [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by La criminalisation de la protestation : dites adieu à la liberté d’expression aux États-Unis &#171; Realinfos</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>La criminalisation de la protestation : dites adieu à la liberté d’expression aux États-Unis &#171; Realinfos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>[...] loi arrive juste après celle du gouvernement américain ayant débattu pour savoir si oui ou non il fallait détenir indéfiniment les citoyens américains (NdT: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loi arrive juste après celle du gouvernement américain ayant débattu pour savoir si oui ou non il fallait détenir indéfiniment les citoyens américains (NdT: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by Judge Napolitano: No Free Speech in Presence of Secret Service &#8211; Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Act &#124; Maggie&#039;s Notebook</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Napolitano: No Free Speech in Presence of Secret Service &#8211; Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Act &#124; Maggie&#039;s Notebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>[...] This law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by THE CRIMINALIZATION OF PROTEST &#171; sreaves32</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>THE CRIMINALIZATION OF PROTEST &#171; sreaves32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by The Criminalization of Protest &#124; Thought Crime Radio</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>The Criminalization of Protest &#124; Thought Crime Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Americans Detained: The Congressional Debate on Whether to Prohibit the Indefinite Military Detention of U.S. Citizens by The Criminalization of Protest: Say Goodbye To Free Speech in America</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2012/01/14/americans-detained-the-congressional-debate-on-whether-to-prohibit-the-indefinite-military-detention-of-u-s-citizens/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>The Criminalization of Protest: Say Goodbye To Free Speech in America</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=7061#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] law comes at the heels of the US government having debated over whether or not to indefinitely detain US citizens and Attorney General Eric Holder- the Obama administration’s version of John Yoo, arguing that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

