<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Security Law Brief &#187; NGM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/tag/ngm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US Forces Increase in Prelude to Kandahar</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/26/us-forces-increase-in-prelude-to-kandahar/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/26/us-forces-increase-in-prelude-to-kandahar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kandahar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marja]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=5028</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US Special Forces have increased their activity in Kandahar, the spiritual capital of the Taliban, in advance of what will be a larger push to take the city and implement a local, democratic government.  Kandahar is the largest city in southern Afghanistan, and the battle for the city is rapidly becoming the benchmark for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>US Special Forces have increased their activity in Kandahar, the spiritual capital of the Taliban, in advance of what will be a larger push to take the city and implement a local, democratic government.  Kandahar is the largest city in southern Afghanistan, and the battle for the city is rapidly becoming the benchmark for the Obama Administration’s strategy in Afghanistan.  The success of the Obama Administration in the region will turn on whether US military force can aid local resistance efforts in winning over the populace while overcoming a distrust of foreign forces and lack of cooperation among local tribes.</div>
<p>The push for Kandahar has already been set in motion, and it will continue over a period of time with a gradual increase in military activity.  The offensive began in the area of Marja but will face continued obstacles in Kandahar, as it is a much larger and more complex urban area.  In response to the military activity in Marja, the Taliban have increased their attacks on moderate city officials and local spiritual leaders as a warning to tribal leaders for cooperating with the US offensive.  Indeed, US forces are dependent on the willful cooperation of these local tribal leaders to be the face of the offensive on the ground.  In fact, the majority of US involvement within Kandahar will be limited to covert Special Forces teams.  Conventional troops have begun operations outside of Kandahar in order to shape the offensive in a series of provinces that surround the city; however, the driving force within the city is designed to come from a local resistance.</p>
<p>As outlined, the Kandahar offensive is strikingly similar to the 2007 troop surge in Iraq which aimed to secure Baghdad and the Anbar province.  Not only has there been an increase in allied forces, but there has been heavy focus in gaining the trust of and allying together the local tribes in return for economic incentives to assist local development.  Concurrent with the increased military involvement, the strategy also includes Afghan-styled town hall meetings between government officials and local tribal leaders.  The aim of these meetings is to show the local tribal leaders how they would be better off without the Taliban Administration.  To read more on the strategy and its developments, click <a title="Click here to read more!" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/world/asia/26kandahar.html?ref=world" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/26/us-forces-increase-in-prelude-to-kandahar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Administration Hosts Nuclear Security Summit</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/12/obama-administration-hosts-nuclear-security-summit/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/12/obama-administration-hosts-nuclear-security-summit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear safeguards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama Administration is hosting a two-day summit on nuclear security beginning today in Washington, DC.  The summit is the largest meeting of world leaders since World War II and hopes to foster an international dialogue on controlling the spread of nuclear weapons and technology.  In particular, the administration has labeled the acquisition of nuclear [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama Administration is hosting a two-day summit on nuclear security beginning today in Washington, DC.  The summit is the largest meeting of world leaders since World War II and hopes to foster an international dialogue on controlling the spread of nuclear weapons and technology.  In particular, the administration has labeled the acquisition of nuclear material by a terrorist organization as &#8220;. . . the single biggest threat to U.S. security, both [sic] short term, medium term and long term . . . .&#8221;</p>
<p>At the onset of the summit, President Obama will meet with the leaders of the four other voting members of the UN Security Council to discuss Iranian sanctions and the countries current levels of uranium enrichment.  The summit takes place in the wake  renewed US-Russia bilateral agreements to reduce current stockpiles of nuclear weapons in both countries.  The administration has voiced particular concerns over the nuclear weapons and materials in the former Soviet block which are not currently safeguarded to international standards and will discuss increasing those safeguards during the two-day summit.  The summit will aim to shift the focus of safeguards from a bilateral concern to an international concern.</p>
<p>The nations participating in the summit include Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, the Czech Republic, Egypt, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Switzerland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, Ukraine and Vietnam.  The European Union, United Nations, and the International Atomic Energy Agency will also be represented.</p>
<p>The administration has moved nuclear security to the forefront of its international agenda and has been criticized as &#8220;too weak&#8221; by Republicans in light of the current situations with North Korea and Iran.  Additionally, Iran&#8217;s state news agency recently quoted Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei saying that the Obama administration &#8220;poses a threat to international peace&#8221; and is &#8220;wicked and untrustworthy.&#8221; For more information on the summit, click <a title="click here to read more" href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/11/nuclear.security.summit/index.html?hpt=T1" target="_blank">here</a>, <a title="click here to read more" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/12/world/12nuke.html?hp" target="_blank">here</a>, and <a title="click here to read more" href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/12/nuclear.security.summit/index.html?hpt=T2" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/12/obama-administration-hosts-nuclear-security-summit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taliban Claim Attack on US Consulate in Peshawar</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/05/taliban-claim-attack-on-us-consulate-in-peshawar/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/05/taliban-claim-attack-on-us-consulate-in-peshawar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 16:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peshawar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Consulate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan militant group claimed responsibility for a coordinated attack on the US Consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan. The attack included a vehicular suicide bomber and two attackers who tried to enter the compound using grenades. All US citizens were accounted for; some suffered minor injuries. At least six were killed, including two Pakistani consulate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan militant group claimed responsibility for a coordinated attack on the US Consulate in Peshawar, Pakistan. The attack included a vehicular suicide bomber and two attackers who tried to enter the compound using grenades. All US citizens were accounted for; some suffered minor injuries. At least six were killed, including two Pakistani consulate employees.</p>
<p>US and Pakistani governments have released statements condemning the attacks which followed hours after a separate suicide bomber detonated in another part of the North West Frontier Province killing over 30 people. The Pakistani Taliban also claimed credit for this attack. Embassy officials and security forces have restored order around the consulate, noting that the attack was well armed and coordinated.</p>
<p>Taliban spokesman Azam Tariq told Reuters news service that &#8220;Americans are our enemies. We carried out the attack on their consulate in Peshawar. We plan more such attacks.&#8221; The attack on the consulate was the first attack against a US target in four years; in 2006, a US diplomat was killed by a vehicle suicide bomber near the US consulate in Karachi.</p>
<p>Read more:</p>
<p><a title="click here to read more" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8603288.stm" target="_blank">BBC News</a>, <a title="click here to read more" href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/04/05/pakistan.blast/index.html?hpt=T1" target="_blank">CNN World News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/04/05/taliban-claim-attack-on-us-consulate-in-peshawar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Hacker Sentenced to 20 Years</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/29/u-s-hacker-sentenced-to-20-years/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/29/u-s-hacker-sentenced-to-20-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. hacker Albert Gonzales was convicted of three counts of computer fraud and will serve 20 years in prison.  Gonzales was a part of a trio of hackers who stole more than 130 million credit and debit card numbers by hacking into retailers&#8217; payment systems and payment processing services.  One judge referred to the attack [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. hacker Albert Gonzales was convicted of three counts of computer fraud and will serve 20 years in prison.  Gonzales was a part of a trio of hackers who stole more than 130 million credit and debit card numbers by hacking into retailers&#8217; payment systems and payment processing services.  One judge referred to the attack as &#8220;. . . the largest and most costly example of computer hacking in US history.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gonzales was initially accused last August along with two Russian co-conspirators.  As part of his plea agreement, Gonzales turned over over $1 million in cash, a condo in Miami, a car, a diamond ring, and several high-end watches.  Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer of the Department of Justice noted that these types of attacks are attempted on a daily basis by cyber criminals, and the credit card numbers of unsuspecting American consumers are the likely targets.  As such, Bruer stated that &#8220;[t]hese sentences &#8211; some of the longest ever imposed for hacking crimes &#8211; send a powerful message to hackers around the globe that U.S. law enforcement will not allow [hackers] to breach American computer networks and payment systems, or illegally obtain identities.&#8221; Read more <a title="Click here to read more." href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8588642.stm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>The frequency and complexity of hacking crime rings and identity theft has increase over the last 12 months.  For a similar story from late 2009 click <a title="Click here to read more." href="http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2009/11/16/eight-indicted-in-international-hacking-ring/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/29/u-s-hacker-sentenced-to-20-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghan Insurgents Begin Talks with Karzai</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/22/afghan-insurgents-begin-talks-with-karzai/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/22/afghan-insurgents-begin-talks-with-karzai/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karzai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A delegation from the Hezb-e-Islami group has initiated talks with President Karzai in Kabul in what is now the first confirmed direct contact between the group and Afghan leadership.  The Hezb-e-Islami group is led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and has been known to have contacts with the Taliban; although, the two groups have recently come into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A delegation from the Hezb-e-Islami group has initiated talks with President Karzai in Kabul in what is now the first confirmed direct contact between the group and Afghan leadership.  The Hezb-e-Islami group is led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar and has been known to have contacts with the Taliban; although, the two groups have recently come into conflict.  Hekmatyar, who is currently wanted by the U.S., leads a the large concentration of forces in north-eastern Afghanistan.</p>
<p>The delegation is led by Hekmatyar&#8217;s deputy, Qutbuddin Helal; both men are former prime ministers.  The delegation came to the talks with a list of demands, which included a withdrawal of foreign forces from Afghanistan by this coming summer-a year ahead of President Obama&#8217;s plan to begin withdrawal.  The group also demanded new elections in the coming year and a new constitution.  A spokesman for Hekmatyar said, &#8220;[t]he main condition is the empowerment of President Karzai to . . . make decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hekmatyar&#8217;s Hezb-e-Islami group-along with the Taliban-has been the source of much of the insurgent violence in the country.  The two groups had be allied in their opposition to the presence of foreign forces and the country&#8217;s central government.  However, earlier this month, at least sixty insurgents were killed during in-fighting in northern Afghanistan.  Hekmatyar received US military aid during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan; however, he was later shunned for his part in the mutiny among the mujahideen which resulted in the death of more than 25,000 civilians.  In 2003, Hekmatyar was labeled a terrorist by the U.S. for his connections to al-Qaeda.</p>
<p>Read more <a title="Click here to read more." href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8579380.stm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/22/afghan-insurgents-begin-talks-with-karzai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US-Israeli Relations Enter Serious Crisis, Likely to Affect Peace Talks</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/15/us-israeli-relations-enter-serious-crisis-likely-to-affect-peace-talks/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/15/us-israeli-relations-enter-serious-crisis-likely-to-affect-peace-talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel-Palestine Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace Talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israel officials recently announced plans to build of over 1,500 new homes in Ramat Shlomo in East Jerusalem. The settlement plans were disclosed last week during a visit by Vice-President Biden to Israel. According to international law, further settlement construction in East Jerusalem is outlawed; Israel, however, does not recognize the prohibition. On Sunday, top aide to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel officials recently announced plans to build of over 1,500 new homes in Ramat Shlomo in East Jerusalem. The settlement plans were disclosed last week during a visit by Vice-President Biden to Israel. According to international law, further settlement construction in East Jerusalem is outlawed; Israel, however, does not recognize the prohibition.</p>
<p>On Sunday, top aide to President Obama, David Axelrod, called the announcement during Vice-President Biden&#8217;s an &#8220;insult&#8221; and  predicted that it will have &#8220;destructive&#8221; implications for the proposed proxy peace talks. The State Department issued statements criticizing the Israeli government, and Palestinian leaders have responded by stating the indirect talks with Israel were now &#8220;doubtful.&#8221;</p>
<p>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responding by labeling the announcement was a &#8220;bureaucratic mix-up.&#8221; He added that the timing was regrettable. However, amid the Prime Minister&#8217;s efforts to downplay the recent decline in US-Israel relations, the Israeli Ambassador to the US, Michael Oren, was recently quoted as saying that &#8220;Israel&#8217;s ties with the US are in the most serious crisis since 1975.&#8221; In 1975, then Secretary of State Henry Kissinger demanded Israel partially withdraw troops from the Sinai Peninsula &#8211; decreasing the Isreali presence in the area established during the Six-Day War of 1967. The recent settlement plans have only aggravated an already declining climate.</p>
<p>Palestinian officials have threatened to indefinitely stall the newly-proposed proxy talks unless the Ramat Shlomo settlement plans are abandoned. Read more <a title="click here to read more" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8567706.stm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/15/us-israeli-relations-enter-serious-crisis-likely-to-affect-peace-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New IAEA Chief Takes Hardline Towards Iranian Nuclear Program</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/01/new-iaea-chief-takes-hardline-towards-iranian-nuclear-program/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/01/new-iaea-chief-takes-hardline-towards-iranian-nuclear-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his first board meeting as the new chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mr. Yukiya Amano made clear that he does not believe Iran has been cooperating with the agency&#8217;s efforts to assess the current state of the Iranian nuclear program. Mr. Amano made statements before a thirty-five-nation board meeting of the IAEA in Vienna [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his first board meeting as the new chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mr. Yukiya Amano made clear that he does not believe Iran has been cooperating with the agency&#8217;s efforts to assess the current state of the Iranian nuclear program. Mr. Amano made statements before a thirty-five-nation board meeting of the IAEA in Vienna indicating that Iran has continued to avoid agency demands for verification of non-diversion of nuclear materials. Analysts have noted this as the first signal that Mr. Amano will take hard-line stance towards Iran with respect to its nuclear ambitions when compared to his IAEA predecessor, Mr. Mohamed El-Baradei.</p>
<p>The logical extension of this hard-line stance is a greater push for sanctions. The IAEA operates as the nuclear watchdog for the UN Security Council and could have influence in persuading China and Russia to sign on to sanctions. China and Russia have veto power on the security council and have voiced opposition to sanctions because of the high level of Iranian oil they import. Iran&#8217;s Foreign Minister, Mr. Manouchehr Mottaki, rejected Mr. Amano&#8217;s statements, noting that Iran has cooperated with the IAEA and plans to continue cooperating. Iran claims that its nuclear efforts are purely for power generation and medical use. Iran has also alleged that the IAEA has been influenced by US interests.</p>
<p>The IAEA&#8217;s stricter stance towards Iran comes in the wake of Iran&#8217;s announcement to increase uranium enrichment to twenty percent and build ten new enrichment facilities throughout the country. Additionally, Secretary Clinton was recently quoted in a tour of the Middle East as worrying that the Revolutionary Guard has supplanted the Iranian government. Read more <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8543401.stm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/03/01/new-iaea-chief-takes-hardline-towards-iranian-nuclear-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Israeli Drone Can Reach Iran</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/22/new-israeli-drone-can-reach-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/22/new-israeli-drone-can-reach-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UAV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uranium Enrichment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=4000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Israeli Air Force has unveiled a new fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles that have the capacity to fly missions for over twenty consecutive hours. With such capabilities, the new Eitan drones could reach Iran and the Gulf in a single mission. The drones have a wingspan of eighty-six feet and are approximately the size of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Israeli Air Force has unveiled a new fleet of unmanned aerial vehicles that have the capacity to fly missions for over twenty consecutive hours. With such capabilities, the new Eitan drones could reach Iran and the Gulf in a single mission. The drones have a wingspan of eighty-six feet and are approximately the size of a Boeing 737 passenger jet; this places the Eitan as the second largest UAV model in the world.</p>
<p>The Eitan can be used for long-range endurance missions to provide enemy surveillance, jam communications systems, and carry heavy payloads. The IAF has not confirmed, however, if the Eitan will be outfitted for a weapons payload. The use of combat-ready UAV&#8217;s has been common in US missions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen. One such UAV, the Hunter, which has been utilized by US forces, was built by Israel.</p>
<p>The unveiling of the Eitan comes during heightened tensions in the region resulting from Iran&#8217;s announcement of plans to  increase uranium enrichment above twenty percent and construct additional nuclear facilities. Israeli officials have suggested the likely use of military force if diplomatic efforts to curb Iran&#8217;s nuclear program fail. To read more and see a demonstration of the Eitan, click <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8527268.stm" target="_blank">here </a>and <a href="http://www.defense-update.com/features/2010/february/eitan_rollout_21022010.html" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/22/new-israeli-drone-can-reach-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Narrows In On Chinese Cyber Security Threat</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/22/us-narrows-in-on-chinese-cyber-security-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/22/us-narrows-in-on-chinese-cyber-security-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyber Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=3996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Financial Times has reported that US investigators are narrowing their search for the author of malicious code which recently attacked a number of US companies, most notably Google. Reports describe the author of the code as a Chinese freelance security consultant in his 30&#8242;s who actually posted portions of the code on the web. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Financial Times has reported that US investigators are narrowing their search for the author of malicious code which recently attacked a number of US companies, most notably Google. Reports describe the author of the code as a Chinese freelance security consultant in his 30&#8242;s who actually posted portions of the code on the web. The code exploited a weakness in Microsoft&#8217;s Internet Explorer Browser and was used to mine the email accounts of noted Chinese Human Rights Activists. Microsoft has since released a patch for Internet Explorer in response to these attacks.</p>
<p>Reports also suggest that Chinese officials had access to the source code of the attacks. Quotes from unnamed Chinese government researches have surfaced and demonstrate that the government may have known of the codes development and motivations. Additionally, two Chinese universities have been linked to the attack- Shanghai Jiaotong University and the Lanxiang School- however, both schools deny any knowledge and involvement. Read more <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8527944.stm" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/22/us-narrows-in-on-chinese-cyber-security-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Operation Moshtarak Continues to Force Taliban from Strongholds</title>
		<link>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/15/operation-moshtarak-continues-to-force-taliban-from-strongholds/</link>
		<comments>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/15/operation-moshtarak-continues-to-force-taliban-from-strongholds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nickolas Milonas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NGM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Moshtarak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/?p=3762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nato and Afghan officials reported that Operation Moshtarak, the largest military coalition attack since the Taliban fell in 2001, has been successful in pushing back Talbian insurgents from areas around Marjah and Nad Ali. Coalition forces led by the British are moving quickly through the Nad Ali area; however, US Marines are haven been slowed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nato and Afghan officials reported that Operation Moshtarak, the largest military coalition attack since the Taliban fell in 2001, has been successful in pushing back Talbian insurgents from areas around Marjah and Nad Ali. Coalition forces led by the British are moving quickly through the Nad Ali area; however, US Marines are haven been slowed in their objectives in the Marjah area due to increased sniper attacks and IED explosions.</p>
<p>Local Afghan residents have been assisting coalition forces to locate explosives left by the Taliban. The cleared areas have been secured and await Afghan police forces to enter to provide continued stability.  The protection of local residents has been one of the major concerns of Operation Moshtarak &#8211; from both a Nato and Afghan perspective. Unfortunately, however, a rocket fired by coalition forces over the weekend missed its target, hit a different building, and killed 12 Afghan citizens. Nato Commander General Stanley McChrystal said he deeply regretted the loss of life and temporarily suspended the use of all rocket systems. Afghan President Hamid Karzai also ordered an investigation.</p>
<p>At the same conference where General McChrystal and President Karzai made these remarks, Afghan interior minister Mohammad Hanif Atmar urged all remaining Taliban fighters to surrender, stating, &#8220;[y]ou cannot win there, the Afghan people are determined to win.&#8221; Read more at <a title="BBC." href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8516480.stm" target="_blank">BBC.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nationalsecuritylawbrief.com/2010/02/15/operation-moshtarak-continues-to-force-taliban-from-strongholds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

